NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: 1st Available v Melocco [2016] NSWSC 30 Hearing dates: 29/04/14, 9/10/14, 10/10/14, 03/11/14, 20/11/14 Date of orders: 05 February 2016 Decision date: 05 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hidden J Decision: Defendant found guilty of contempt. Taking into account her apology, no penalty imposed. Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – breaches of undertakings to the court by the defendant in relation to proceedings brought against her by the plaintiffs – whether terms of the undertaking is unambiguous because of obvious errors in the document setting them out – whether contempt motion resolved by subsequent dead of settlement of the proceedings – contempt established but no penalty imposed. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Athens v Randwick City Council [2005] NSWCA 317, 64 NSWLR 58 Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273 AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWCA 81, 78 NSWLR 302 B & B Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Brian A Cheeseman & Associates Pty Ltd (1994) 35 NSWLR 227 Commissioner of Fair Trading v Rixon (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 431 Electric Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd [2014] HCA 7, 251 CLR 640 Gilbert v Gilbert [1955] St R Qd 245 Hughes v NM Superannuation Pty Ltd [1993] 29 NSWLR 653 Karam v ANZ Banking Group [2001] NSWSC 709 Kirkpatrick v Kotis [2004] NSWSC 1265, 62 NSWLR 567 Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd (2006) FCA 83, 149 FCR 494 National Australia Bank (NAB) Limited v Juric [2001] VSC 375 NCR Australia v Cricket Connection [2005] NSWSC 1118 S & M Motor Repairs v Caltex Oil (1988) 12 NSWLR 358 Wende v Horwath (NSW) Pty Limited [2014] NSWCA 170 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 Wyszynski v Bill [2005] NSWSC 110 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of Australia Category: Principal judgment Parties: 1st Available Ltd (1st plaintiff) Klaus Bartosch (2nd plaintiff) Kathryn Ann Melocco (defendant) Representation: Counsel: T Blackburn SC with ATS Dawson (plaintiffs) JB Conomy (Sol) with JM Laxon (Sol) (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate