NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Collis v Hagelstein; Hagelstein v Slater [2015] NSWDC 351 Hearing dates: 15 June 2015 – 18 June 2015 Decision date: 24 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: 1. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of $952,979. The Court notes that the verdict and judgment against the second defendant would be for $1,181,979.83, exceeding the extended jurisdictional limit. Accordingly, verdict and judgment is entered for the plaintiff against the second defendant in the amount of the extended jurisdictional limit of $1,125,000. 2. Verdict and judgment on the cross-claim for the cross‑claimant against the cross‑defendant for 65% of the damages awarded against the cross‑claimant on the statement of claim, namely $619,436.89. 3. The defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed. 4. On the cross‑claim, the cross‑defendant is to pay the cross‑claimant's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – torts – negligence – personal injury – motor accident caused by cows on road – plaintiff's employment options and lifestyle substantially impacted by accident – liability admitted by first defendant – second defendant failed to adequately fence land allowing cows onto highway – second defendant found to be liable in negligence – respective contributions of defendants – liability apportioned between defendants – award of damages – general damages – 40% of a most extreme case – compensable earnings – whether 13 week period sufficiently representative Legislation Cited: Animals Act 1977 (NSW), ss 7, 9 Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5C, 5D District Court Act 1973 (NSW), 22 44, 51 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 179 CLR 520 Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330 Strong v Woolworths Ltd (2013) 246 CLR 182 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Allan Collis (Plaintiff) Errol Hagelstein (First defendant and cross-claimant) Darren Alan Slater (Second defendant and cross-defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Toomey (Plaintiff) D O'Dowd (First defendant and cross claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate