Carlene Randall v City of Canada Bay Council (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 36

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Carlene Randall v City of Canada Bay Council (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 36 Hearing dates: 5 February 2016 Date of orders: 08 February 2016 Decision date: 08 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Notice of Motion dismissed Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Nature of misapprehension of facts or law sufficient to warrant setting aside judgment – UCPR Pt 36; r 36.16(1), (3A) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Constitution Act 1902 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) Cases Cited: Autodesk v Dyason (No 2) [1993] HCA 6; (1993) 176 CLR 300 Bailey v Marinoff [1971] HCA 49; (1971) 125 CLR 529 Balog v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [1990] HCA 28; (1990) 169 CLR 625 Carlene Randall v City of Canada Bay Council [No 4] [2015] NSWSC 1759 Coco v The Queen [1994] HCA 15; (1994) 179 CLR 427 Cooper v Commissioner for Income Tax (Qld) [1907] HCA 27; (1907) 4 CLR 1304 Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Ltd [1995] HCA 68; (1995) 183 CLR 563 Momcilovic v The Queen [2011] HCA 34; (2011) 245 CLR 1 New South Wales v Commonwealth of Australia (Work Choices Case) [2006] HCA 52; (2006) 229 CLR 1 Rail Signalling Services Pty Ltd v Victoria Rail Track [2012] VSC 452 Rockcote Enterprises Pty Ltd v FS Architects Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2); Carelli v FS Architects Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 205 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Carlene Randall (Plaintiff) City of Canada Bay Council (Defendant) Representation: F. Agresta (by leave for the Plaintiff)