NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Knox v Ku-ring-gai Council [2016] NSWLEC 1039 Hearing dates: 28 – 29 January 2016 Date of orders: 05 February 2016 Decision date: 05 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Development Application No. 0001/15 for the construction of a tennis court at 8 Wahroonga Avenue, Wahroonga is refused consent. 3. The exhibits, other than exhibits 4, B and F, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: proposed tennis court; removal of trees; impact on endangered ecological community. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Terrace Tower Holdings Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 195 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jennifer Knox (Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D. Clarke solicitor (Applicant) Mr C. Shaw solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Clamenz Lawyers (Applicant) Swaab Attorneys (Respondent) File Number(s): 10863 of 2015
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 0001/15 for the construction of a tennis court, including a concrete slab, fencing and a controlled discharge drainage pit and the removal of trees (the proposal), at 8 Wahroonga Avenue, Wahroonga (the site) by Ku-ring-gai Council (the Council). 2. The appeal was subject to mandatory conciliation on 28 January 2016, in accordance with the provisions of s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). As agreement was not reached during the conciliation phase, the conciliation conference was terminated pursuant to s 34AA(2)(b) and the proceedings dealt with as a hearing held forthwith, pursuant to s 34AA(2)(b)(i) of the LEC Act. The parties consented to the admission of evidence given during the conciliation conference in the hearing, pursuant to s 34(12) LEC Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate