NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kim Sean Mann v R [2016] NSWCCA 10 Hearing dates: 19 October 2015 Date of orders: 12 February 2016 Decision date: 12 February 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Hidden J at [3] Davies J at [31] Decision: Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, verdict and judgment of acquittal entered Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – affray – whether verdict unreasonable – evidence that appellant present during a fight between two other men - whether evidence sufficient to establish appellant's involvement by encouragement or willingness to assist Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Colosimo v Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] NSWSC 854, (2005) 64 NSWLR 645 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606 Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316 R v Allan & Ors [1965] 1 QB 130 R v Chishimba & Ors [2010] NSWCCA 228 R v Coney (1882) 8 QBD 534 R v Donnelly [2001] NSWCCA 394 R v Phan [2001] NSWCCA 29, 53 NSWLR 480 R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13, 243 CLR 400 Youkhana v R [2015] NSWCCA 41 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kim Sean Mann (appellant) Regina (respondent /Crown) Representation: Counsel: I McLachlan (appellant) E Balodis (respondent/Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate