NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lahoud v Hooper [2016] NSWCA 11 Hearing dates: 5 February 2016 Date of orders: 05 February 2016 Decision date: 05 February 2016 Before: Meagher JA at [1] and [21]; Leeming JA at [2] Decision: (1) Dismiss the applicant's summons seeking leave to appeal.
(2) Order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of that summons. Catchwords: PRACTICE – preliminary discovery – application for leave to appeal from decision refusing preliminary discovery – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 96 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 5.2 Cases Cited: John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Cojuangco (1988) 165 CLR 346 Lahoud v Hooper [2015] NSWSC 1026 The Age Company Ltd v Liu [2013] NSWCA 26; 82 NSWLR 268 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Victor Lahoud (Applicant) John Hooper (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Hmelnitsky SC (Applicant) M R Elliott, J Curtin (Respondent)
Solicitors: McLachlan Thorpe Partners (Applicant) Minter Ellison (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/305913 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Common Law Citation: [2015] NSWSC 1405 Date of Decision: 25 September 2015 Before: Adamson J File Number(s): 2015/241163
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate