NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Carratt v R [2016] NSWDC 7 Decision date: 08 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: Appeals allowed. In respect of the larceny (sequence 1) the sentence is varied by reducing the non-parole period from six months and 23 days to six months, to expire on 22 March 2016. In respect of the contravene apprehended domestic violence order offence, the non-parole period is reduced from eight months to six months to expire on 22 March 2016. In respect of the second shoplifting offence the non-parole period is reduced from eight months to six months to expire on 22 March 2016. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals against sentence – non-parole period exceeds 75% - special circumstances for reducing ratio between head sentence and non-parole period – youth of offender – first time in custody – need to re-engage with treating psychologist – reduction not opposed by Crown Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 9, 20, 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mitchell Carratt (Appellant) Regina (Crown) (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: K Beresford, Legal Aid NSW (Appellant) R Buttini, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/142223;2014/052902;2014/174786 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Local Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 30 November 2015 Before: Connell LCM File Number(s): 2011/142223; 2014/052902; 2014/174786
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate