NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Manning v Matsen (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 70 Hearing dates: 10 February 2016 Date of orders: 10 February 2016 Decision date: 10 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on the ordinary basis up to and including 9 June 2014. The plaintiff will pay the defendant's costs on the indemnity basis after 9 June 2014. Catchwords: COSTS – Indemnity costs – defendant successful at hearing – two Calderbank letters served before hearing – whether plaintiff should pay defendant's indemnity costs – whether the defendant was unreasonable in refusing the offer – public interest in deciding obscure or difficult points of law – whether genuine compromise is offered – incomplete filing of defendant's evidence at time of offer. Legislation Cited: Succession Act, Part 3.2 Cases Cited: Jones v Bradley (No. 2) [2003] NSWCA 258 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 Manning v Matsen [2015] NSWSC 1801 Singleton v Macquarie Broadcasting Holdings Pty Limited (1991) 24 NSWLR 103 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff: Sharon Lee Manning Defendant: Wayne Robert Matsen Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: A. Gruzman Defendant: V. Hartstein
Solicitors: Plaintiff: Annamaria Bernadette Marano, McBride Harle & Martin Defendant: Stephen Churches, Armstrongs Solicitors Pty Limited File Number(s): 2013/363737 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate