NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bao v R [2016] NSWCCA 16 Hearing dates: 9 February 2015 Decision date: 19 February 2016 Before: Chief Justice Bathurst at [1] Hoeben CJ at CL at [2] Acting Justice RS Hulme at [78] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – five counts of supplying a prohibited drug and one count of possessing a precursor with intent to manufacture – different discounts for pleas of guilty averaged over indicative sentences – error conceded by Crown – need for Court to re-sentence – no lesser sentence warranted in law. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – s 10A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 – s 5(1)(c) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 – s 166 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 – s 24A(1)(a); s 25(1) Cases Cited: Glare v R [2015] NSWCCA 194 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA37; 252 CLR 601 Knight v R [2015] NSWCCA 222 Miletic v R [2008] NSWCCA 74 Pham v R [2014] NSWCCA 115 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 195 A Crim R 1 R v Chidiac [2015] NSWCCA 241 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v SY and Anor [2003] NSWCCA 291 R v Wicks [2012] NSWCCA 208 Vandeventer v R [2013] NSWCCA 33 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ann Bao – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr G Jauncey - Applicant Ms S Herbert – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate