NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Elwood v R [2016] NSWCCA 18 Hearing dates: 7 July 2015 Decision date: 22 February 2016 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; McCallum J at [58]; Button J at [60] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL – conviction – armed assault with intent to rob on basis of joint criminal enterprise – whether verdict unreasonable or not supported by evidence – whether open to jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt as to appellant's participation in agreement to rob and knowledge of offensive weapon – whether jury's verdict finding appellant guilty could logically and reasonably stand with verdict of not guilty in relation to co-accused – whether different verdicts so inconsistent necessary to intervene to prevent injustice occasioned by guilty verdict – where rational bases may account for different verdicts – where verdict of guilty was open on the evidence – no miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(b) Cases Cited: Hawi v R [2014] NSWCCA 83 Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30; 230 CLR 559 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 MacKenzie v The Queen [1996] HCA 35; 190 CLR 348 R v Kirkman (1987) 44 SASR 591 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Luke Elwood (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Strickland SC with A Heffernan (Appellant) P G Ingram SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate