NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Williamson Building Corporation Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 2019 Hearing dates: 16 March 2015 Date of orders: 16 March 2015 Decision date: 16 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Brereton J Decision: Interlocutory process for substitution and originating process dismissed. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – winding up in insolvency – failure to comply with creditor's statutory demand – application for substitution – where existence of debt is disputed – onus of demonstrating status of debt on application for substitution – whether applicant has standing as creditor – effect of (NSW) Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 on status of debt – whether debt arising from unanswered payment claim may be disputed – if not, when such debt arises. Legislation Cited: (Cth) Corporations Act 2001, s 459G, s 465B (NSW) Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999, s 7(2), s 11(1A), s 14(1) Cases Cited: In the matter of Aquaqueen International Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 527 Aldoga Aluminium Pty Limited v De Silva Starr Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 284 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Lanepoint Enterprises Pty Ltd (2011) 244 CLR 1 Beverage Holdings Pty Ltd v Greater Pacific Investments Pty Ltd (1990) 3 ACSR 743 Bidald Consultant Pty Ltd v Miles Special Builders Pty Ltd (2005) 54 ACSR 228 In the matter of C2C Investments Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1443 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Broadbeach Properties Pty Ltd [2008] HCA 41; (2008) 237 CLR 473 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sun Heating Pty Ltd [1983] 2 NSWLR 78; (1983) 9 ACLR 314 Diploma Construction (WA) Pty Ltd v KPA Architects Pty Ltd [2014] WASCA 91 In the matter of Douglas Aerospace Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 167 Earthwave Corporation Pty Ltd v Starcom Group Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 694 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Riche Corp Pty Limited (plaintiff) Williamson Building Corporation Pty Ltd (defendant) Xanvic Pty Limited (applicant) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC (plaintiff and applicant) F Assaf (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate