NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Greenhills Securities Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 2021 Hearing dates: 16 March 2015 Date of orders: 17 March 2015 Decision date: 17 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Brereton J Decision: Interlocutory process dismissed with costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – setting aside orders of trial judge – where orders allegedly made irregularly, illegally or against good faith – whether necessary for application to be made in separate proceedings – discretion to alter, vary or set aside orders under UCPR, r 36.16 – circumstances informing discretion – fresh evidence – where application would require re-opening of hearing – absence of explanation as to failure to adduce evidence at hearing – held, orders of trial judge not set aside. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 36.15, r 36.16 Cases Cited: Ainsworth v Wilding [1896] 1 Ch 673 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (1992) 173 CLR 330; Cabassi v Ferrando (1940) 64 CLR 130 Cash v Wells (1830) 1 B & Ad 375; 109 BR 826 Charles Bright & Co Ltd v Sellar [1904] 1 KB 6 Cole v Langford [1898] 2 QB 36 De L v Director-General, Department of Community Services (NSW) (1997) 190 CLR 207 Flower v Lloyd (1877) 6 Ch D 297 Goldring v National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Limited (1916) 22 CLR 336 Greenhills Securities Pty Limited v Loire Consultants Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 13 Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235 Kendell v Carnegie [2006] NSWCA 302; (2006) 68 NSWLR 193 McDonald v McDonald (1965) 113 CLR 529 Re Barrell Enterprises [1972] 3 All ER 631 Roach v B & W Steel Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 110 Smith v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 Spies v The Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691 Wentworth v Rogers (No 9) (1987) 8 NSWLR 388 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672 Xenos v National Australia Bank Ltd [2007] NSWSC 973 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Greenhills Securities Pty Limited (plaintiff) Loire Consultants Pty Limited (first defendant) David William Dixon (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Mostafa (plaintiff/respondent) R Glasson (first defendant/applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate