NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mielczarek v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force and Commissioner for Fair Trading. [2016] NSWCATAD 34 Hearing dates: 4 November 2015, 12 January, 28 January 2016. Date of orders: 22 February 2016 Decision date: 22 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Prof G Walker, Senior Member Decision: Decision under review affirmed. Catchwords: TATTOO PARLOURS –tattooist licence –fit and proper person –public interest—Rebels OMCG membership –drive-by shooting – murder – applicant not implicated –membership as a risk in itself. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997; Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013; Competition and Consumer Act 2012 (Cth); Crimes (Criminal Organisations Control) Act 2012; Interpretation Act 1987; Liquor Act 1992 (Qld); Statutes of Livery 1377 – 1468; Tattoo Parlours Act 2012. Cases Cited: Blisset v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2006] NSWADT 114; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384; Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor (1995) 131 ALR 657; Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9; Commissioner for ACT Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576; Constantin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (GD) [2013] NSWADTAP 16; Deakin v Commissioner for Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCADAT 2; Dyas v Director-General, Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 223; Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1991] VicRep 6, [1991] 1 VR 63; Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60; Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307; Kirbach v Health Care Complaints Commission (No. 2) [2015] NSWCATAD 234; Heydon's Case (1584) 3 Co Rep 7a, 7b; 76 ER 637; Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No. 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127; Naziry v Director-General, Ministry of Transport [2004] NSWADT 40; O'Sullivan v Farrar [1989] HCA 61, (1989) 168 CLR 210; Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28, (1998) 194 CLR 355; Re Queensland Electricity Commission; ex parte Electrical Trades Union of Australia (1987) 72 ALR 1; R v Bolton; ex parte Beane (1987) 162 CLR 514; Re Phillip Morris and Prime Minister (2011) 122 ALD 619; Saadieh v Director-General, Department of Transport [1999] NSWADT 68; Smith v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force and New South Wales Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 184; Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Broad (1979) 22 SASR 70; Zahra v Commissioner of Police [2014] NSWCATAD 211. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aleksander Mielczarek (applicant) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force; Commissioner for Fair Trading (respondents). Representation: Counsel: G Doyle (Applicant) A Rao (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate