NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Heath v Regina [2016] NSWCCA 24 Hearing dates: 2 February 2016 Date of orders: 25 February 2016 Decision date: 25 February 2016 Before: Simpson JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] McCallum J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentences quashed; applicant re-sentenced, for the matched trade offence, to a term of imprisonment of 18 months commencing on 25 September 2015 and expiring on 24 March 2017; for the market manipulation offence, to a term of imprisonment of 18 months commencing on 25 December 2015 and expiring on 24 June 2017; applicant to be released today, 25 February 2016, on a recognisance release order in the sum of $10,000 without surety to be of good behaviour for the period ending on 24 June 2017. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – market misconduct offences – whether sentencing judge erred in rejecting applicant's evidence as to lack of knowledge of criminality – where applicant's evidence unchallenged – impact on judge's assessment of objective seriousness – whether applicant was denied procedural fairness
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – market misconduct offences – whether sentencing judge misapprehended seriousness of offending – where applicant's unchallenged evidence addressed extent of impact of his offending on the market
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – proper approach where both error and denial of procedural fairness established – where remittal of proceedings would defeat the object of the appeal – consideration of appropriateness of appellate court re-exercising the sentencing discretion Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001(Cth), s19 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 1041A(c), 1041B(1)(b) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16A(2)(p) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), Ch 1, cl 5.6(2), cl 5.4(4) Cases Cited: Chow v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 593 Fame Decorator Agencies Pty Ltd v Jeffries Industries Ltd (1998) 28 ACSR 58 Ghazal v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1992) 29 NSWLR 336 Green v R; Quinn v R [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Khoo v R [2013] NSWCCA 323 O'Neil-Shaw v R [2010] NSWCCA 42 R v Glynatsis [2013] NSWCCA 131; 230 A Crim R 99 R v Hinton [2001] NSWCCA 405; 134 A Crim R 286 R v Togias [2001] NSWCCA 522; 127 A Crim R 23 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nigel Derek Heath (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: M Thangaraj SC (Applicant) A N Williams (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate