NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AC v R [2016] NSWCCA 21 Hearing dates: 21 October 2015 Decision date: 26 February 2016 Before: Hidden J at [1] Davies J at [2] Adamson J at [107] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appellant charged with multiple counts of sexual offences and assault offences against young children – evidence of uncharged acts not opposed – tendency evidence – whether evidence of significant probative value – whether probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect – whether inconsistent verdicts – whether verdicts unreasonable EVIDENCE - tendency evidence – whether acts relied on lacked similarity Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: BP v R; R v BP [2010] NSWCCA 303 Colby v R [1999] NSWCCA 261 Dungay v R [2010] NSWCCA 82 Hughes v R [2015] NSWCCA 330 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 60 O'Keefe v R [2009] NSWCCA 121 Osland v R [1998] HCA 75; (1998) 197 CLR 316 Potts v R [2012] NSWCCA 229 R v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 303; (2009) 201 A Crim R 451 R v TK [2009] NSWCCA 151; (2009) 74 NSWLR 299 Saoud v R [2014] NSWCCA 136 Sokolwskyji v R [2014] NSWCCA 55 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AC (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Gartelmann & E Anderson (Appellant) M Cinque (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate