NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Huckstadt v R [2016] NSWCCA 22 Hearing dates: 24 November 2015 Decision date: 24 February 2016 Before: Johnson J at [1] Button J at [2] Fagan J at [100] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – drug offences – possession of prohibited weapons – co-offenders – principle of parity – whether the sentence imposed on the applicant demonstrates erroneous disparity when compared with the sentence imposed upon his co-offender Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25(1), 25A(1) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 32 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 10 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW), s 7(1) Cases Cited: Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Lowe v R [1984] HCA 46; (1984) 154 CLR 606 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Geoffrey Huckstadt (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Quilter (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent)
Solicitors: R Gregory – O'Brien Solicitors C Hyland – Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2013/00023743 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Bathurst Date of Decision: 13 March 2014 Before: Colefax SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/23743
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate