NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Fu (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 121 Hearing dates: 23 February 2016 Decision date: 24 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) The notice of motion of 10 February 2016 is dismissed. (2) The application for an alternative order by Ms Qiong Fu is dismissed. (3) Ms Qiong Fu and Ms Ya Qing Shi must pay the costs of the plaintiff of the hearing before me. Catchwords: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) – s 29 hearing – application for vacation of hearing date Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 63 Evidence on Commission Act 1995 (NSW) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 29, 47 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 31.3 Cases Cited: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Qiong Fu [2013] NSWSC 1313 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff/Respondent) QF (First Defendant/Applicant) Ya Qing Shi (Second Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: K Anderson (Plaintiff/Respondent) R Steward (First Defendant/Applicant) G Jones (Second Defendant/Applicant)
Solicitors: Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff/Respondent) AKN and Associated (First Defendant/Applicant) Ren Zhou Lawyers (Second Defendant/Applicant) File Number(s): 2013/272463
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate