NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Morgan v R [2016] NSWCCA 25 Hearing dates: 2 February 2016 Decision date: 26 February 2016 Before: Simpson JA at [1]; Johnson J at [45]; McCallum J at [46] Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – conviction – voice identification evidence – admissibility of opinion evidence – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 76, 79 – whether ad hoc expert evidence within s 79 – no objection raised at trial regarding characterisation of opinion as ad hoc expert evidence – no determination made by trial judge – no error found
APPEAL – conviction – Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 – no objection taken at trial – no basis for the grant of leave – appeal against conviction dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5 and 6 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 76, 79 Cases Cited: Butera v Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) [1987] HCA 58; 164 CLR 180 Honeysett v The Queen [2014] HCA 29; 253 CLR 122 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; 52 NSWLR 705 Morgan v R [2011] NSWCCA 257; 215 A Crim R 33 R v Irani [2008] NSWCCA 217; 188 A Crim R 125 R v Leung and Wong [1999] NSWCCA 287; 47 NSWLR 405 R v Madigan [2005] NSWCCA 170 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raymond George Morgan (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Stratton SC/M Curry (Appellant) N J Adams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate