NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: WorkCover Authority of NSW (Inspector Moore) v E & T Bricklaying Pty Ltd [2016] NSWDC 16 Hearing dates: 24 February 2016 Date of orders: 24 February 2016 Decision date: 24 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: KEARNS DCJ Decision: Order that: E & T be fined the sum of $80,000; Mr Kose be fined the sum of $10,000. In both instances a moiety is to be paid to the prosecutor. Order the defendants to pay the prosecutor's costs. Catchwords: Sentencing – defendants convicted for offences under Work Health and Safety Act 2011 ss 19(1)a, 27 and 32 – purposes of sentencing – ss 3A and 21A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – gravity of the offence – foreseeability of the risk of injury – foreseeability of the consequences of the risk coming home – whether measures available to avoid risk – application of the principle of parity – culpability of defendants – position and responsibility of defendant on worksite – whether general deterrence should be taken into account in sentencing – specific deterrence – whether an order under s 10A(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act or s 239 of the Work Health and Safety Act should be made in respect of the individual defendant – no evidence of remorse or contrition – no prior convictions – victim impact statement Legislation Cited: Work Health and Safety Act 2011; Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: WorkCover Authority of NSW (Inspector Moore) v E & T Bricklaying Pty Ltd [2015] NSWDC 369; WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v JMW Developments Pty Limited [2015] NSWDC 259 Category: Sentence Parties: WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Prosecutor) E & T Bricklaying Pty Ltd (Defendant 13/379508) Eyup Kose (Defendant 13/379523) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Neild, instructed by WorkCover Authority of New South Wales, appeared for the prosecutor Dr S Bogan, instructed by Criminal Defence Group, appeared for the defendants File Number(s): 2013/379508; 2013/379523
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate