NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pty Ltd v Puri [2016] NSWSC 150 Hearing dates: 23 February 2016 Decision date: 23 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [23] of judgment Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — applications for interlocutory injunction and transfer of proceedings — restraint of trade — parties contracted to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Victoria — proceedings could have been commenced in Victoria — in the interests of justice to transfer proceedings to the Supreme Court of Victoria pursuant to s 5(2) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) — claim for interlocutory injunction not heard or determined Legislation Cited: Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Asciano Services Pty Ltd v Australian Rail Track Corp Ltd [2008] NSWSC 652 FAI General Insurance Co v Ocean Marine Mutual Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association Ltd (1997) 41 NSWLR 117 Texts Cited: Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia 8th ed Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Rakesh Puri (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Alkadamani (Plaintiff) M Seck (Defendant)
Solicitors: Haywards Solicitors (Plaintiff) CCI Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/42845
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate