NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Merrick (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 164 Hearing dates: 29 February 2016 – 1 March 2016 Date of orders: 01 March 2016 Decision date: 02 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: The following evidence is rejected:
(1) Evidence connected with the accused's supposed act in slashing the tyres of a bicycle owned by Jackson Blackie; (2) Evidence connected with the accused's abusive comments to the deceased's employer after an error in the calculation or payment of the deceased's salary; (3) Evidence connected with the accused's supposed hatred of David Blackie, except insofar as the evidence is of a threat made to Mr Blackie coupled with a threat made to the deceased; and (4) Insofar as it is necessary for me to do so, I reject the evidence relating to the accused's cocaine use.
See Annexure A for admissibility of text messages. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – admissibility of context evidence – admissibility of relationship evidence – relevance – where that evidence is said to inform the mental element of the charge – where that evidence is said to go to proof of the dangerousness of the act in question – where that evidence is said to go to a proper assessment by the jury of the accounts that the accused has given to others - whether probative value of evidence outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: DJV v R [2008] NSWCCA 272; (2008) 200 A Crim R 206 HML v R [2008] HCA 16; (2008) 245 ALR 204 JDK v R; R v JDK [2009] NSWCCA 76; (2009) 194 A Crim R 333 Qualtieri v R [2006] NSWCCA 95; (2006) 171 A Crim R 463 R v Andrews [2003] NSWCCA 7 R v Clark [2001] NSWCCA 494; (2001) 123 A Crim R 506 R v Garner (1963) 81 WN (Pt 1) NSW 120 R v Do (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 111 Regina v ATM [2000] NSWCCA 475 Regina v Frawley [2005] NSWCCA 66; (2005) 152 A Crim R 336 Wilson v The Queen [1970] HCA 17; (1970) 123 CLR 334 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Ross Albert Merrick Representation: Counsel: Mr B Campbell (Crown) Ms T Evers (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate