NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Coles v R [2016] NSWCCA 32 Hearing dates: 17 February 2016 Decision date: 07 March 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [2] Fullerton J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: Criminal law – appeal against sentence - larceny as bailee, obtain money by deception, fraudulently omit to account – consideration of delay in the sentencing exercise – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to account for delay between investigation and charging of offence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 117, 125,178A and 178BA Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44(2) Cases Cited: Blanco v R [1999] NSWCCA 121; 106 A Crim R 303 McKittrick v R [2014] NSWCCA 128 Mill v R [1988] HCA 70; 166 CLR 59 Pickard v R [2011] SASCFC 134 Sabra v R [2015] NSWCCA 38 Todd v R [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ronald Coles (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Pararajasingham (Applicant) S Dowling SC (Crown)
Solicitors: S Goold (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2012/15754 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 2 May 2014 Before: Townsden DCJ File Number(s): 2012/15754
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate