NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: D'Ettorre v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWSC 179 Hearing dates: 5 February 2016 Decision date: 04 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) The notice of motion of the plaintiff of 29 September 2015 is dismissed. (2) Each party must pay their own costs of the proceedings before me. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – joint application for determination of separate question – whether estoppel operates against defendant – whether issue should be determined prior to trial Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW), s 1(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 28.2 Cases Cited: AAI Ltd t/a Vero Insurance v Solarus Projects Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers appointed) (in liq) [2014] NSWCA 168 Allandale Blue Metal Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services [2013] NSWCA 103 Bailey v Owners Corporation of Strata Plan 62666 [2011] NSWCA 293 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1215 Tallglen Pty Ltd v Pay TC Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 130 Wardley Australia Ltd v The State of Western Australia [1992] HCA 55; (1992) 175 CLR 514 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Paul D'Ettorre (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Andrews (Plaintiff) M Hutchings (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate