NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barrak Corporation Pty Ltd v Jaswil Properties Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 32 Hearing dates: 12 February 2016 Decision date: 07 March 2016 Before: Beazley P; Sackville AJA; Emmett AJA Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed;
2. Set aside the following orders made by Bergin CJ in Eq on 13 April 2015:
(a) Order (1); (b) Order (3); (c) Order (4); (d) Order (5); (e) Order (6);
3. Cross-appeal allowed;
4. Declare that the contract dated 23 October 2014 between the appellant as Purchaser and the respondent as Vendor of the land described in Folio Identifier 1/997613 and known as 63 Victoria Road, Parramatta was not terminated by the appellant's notice of termination dated 26 February 2015;
5. Remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Equity Division for the determination of the respondent's claim for damages;
6. Order that the appellant/cross-respondent pay the respondent/cross-appellant's costs in the court below (including the costs of the cross-summons) and of the appeal and the cross-appeal. Catchwords: CONVEYANCING – notice to complete served – purchaser responsible for serving form of transfer – vendor not ready willing and able to complete by reason of inappropriately executed transfer – whether vendor entitled to terminate
EQUITY – the doctrine in Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi – whether purchaser entitled to relief against termination for breach of essential time provision – relevance of vendor's conduct Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Carrapetta v Rado [2012] NSWCA 202; 16 BPR 30, 997 Champion Home Sales Pty Ltd v DCT Projects Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 616 Falconer v Wilson [1973] 2 NSWLR 131 Fekala Pty Ltd v Castle Constructions Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 297; 11 BPR 20,395 Halfpenny v Wilson (1967) 87 WN (1) (NSW) 547 Kraguljac v A & B Property Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] SASC 1 Malouf v Sterling Estates Development Corporation Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 920 McNally v Waitzer [1981] 1 NSWLR 294 Shepherd v Felt & Textiles of Australia Ltd [1931] HCA 21; 45 CLR 359 Sterling Estates Development Corporation Pty Ltd v Malouf [2003] NSWCA 278; 58 NSWLR 685 Strickland v Grieve (1996) NSW ConvR ¶55-762 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi [2003] HCA 57; 217 CLR 315 Trollope & Colls v North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board [1973] 1 WLR 601 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Barrak Corporation Pty Ltd (Appellant/Cross-Respondent) Jaswil Properties Pty Ltd ATF Jaswil Unit Trust (Respondent/Cross-Appellant) Representation: Counsel: M K Rollinson (Appellant/Cross-Respondent) M Ashhurst SC; A Rogers (Respondent/Cross-Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate