NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nevell v NSW Police Force [2016] NSWCATAD 45 Hearing dates: 22 January 2016 Date of orders: 07 March 2016 Decision date: 07 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Leal, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: Firearms Act - revocation of licence – security guard – firearms safety training - safe keeping and storage requirements. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1996 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Cases Cited: Bottomley v Commissioner of Police [2005] NSWADT 211 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336. Cleofe v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service; Alpha Intelligence Securities Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2001] NSWADT 211 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2001] NSWADT 50 Drake v Minister of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1970) 2 ALD 60 Keane v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2008] NSWADT 68 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Uzelac v Commissioner of Police, Ministry of Police [2003] NSWADT 226 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Phillip Nevell (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Brennan Tipple Partners (Applicant) Bartier Perry (Respondent) File Number(s): 1510697
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate