NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RKF v R [2016] NSWCCA 116 Hearing dates: 3 March 2016 Date of orders: 15 June 2016 Decision date: 15 June 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Hall J at [57]; R A Hulme J at [58] Decision: Grant the applicant leave to appeal. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – interlocutory order – application for trial by judge alone – whether failure to apply principle that applicant is entitled to defend himself by all forensically available means – whether failure to properly balance need for objective community standards against prejudice to accused – whether error in finding directions to jury could overcome prejudice – whether consideration of extraneous material Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61M Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 132 Cases Cited: A2 v R; KM v R; Vaziri v R [2015] NSWCCA 244 Cheih-Wei Lin v R [2015] NSWCCA 264 DAO v R [2011] NSWCCA 63; 81 NSWLR 568 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 R v Belghar [2012] NSWCCA 86 R v BWM (1998) 91 A Crim R 260 Redman v R [2015] NSWCCA 110 Robinson v R [2016] NSWCCA 108 Turnbull v R [2016] NSWCCA 109 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RKF (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Davenport (Applicant) N Adams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate