NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hutley v Cosco [2016] NSWLEC 15 Hearing dates: 4 November 2015, 9 November 2015, 16 November 2015, 17 November 2015, 15 February 2016 Date of orders: 10 March 2016 Decision date: 10 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: (1) The Respondent is to pay the Applicants' costs of the Notice of Motion for contempt dated 14 October 2015.
(2) The Respondent is to pay the Applicants' costs of 4 and 6 November 2015 of the Notice of Motion dated 4 November 2015.
(3) The exhibits are to be returned. Catchwords: CONTEMPT – plea of guilty to civil contempt – contempt unintentional – work to purge contempt completed in course of extended sentencing hearing – Applicants' costs payable on usual basis
PROCEDURE- costs of second notice of motion filed in course of contempt proceedings – whether Applicants' costs ought be paid in absence of a determination of the notice of motion – partial costs order made. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 21A Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.1 Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Sigalla (No 4) [2011] NSWSC 62; (2011) 80 NSWLR 113 Canterbury City Council v Mihalopoulos (No 3) [2012] NSWLEC 72 Greater Hume Shire Council v J & L Cauchi Civil Contracting [2006] NSWLEC 738 Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59; (1990) 170 CLR 534 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 6) [2010] NSWLEC 20 Owners Strata Plan 37762 v Pham (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 306 Pittwater Council v Brown Brothers Waste Contractors Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 210 Queanbeyan City Council v Pre-Cast Concrete Solutions Pty Ltd [2008] NSWLEC 147 Re The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; (1997) 186 CLR 622 Wood v Staunton (No 5) (1996) 86 A Crim R 183 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vanessa Hutley (First Applicant) Anthony Gerald Forward (Second Applicant) Anthony John Cosco (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: J Doyle with I King (Applicants) G Carolan (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate