NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sellak v Sellak, estate of late Corrado Simon Sellak; Sellak v Sellak [2016] NSWSC 213 Hearing dates: 18, 19 and 20 November 2015 Date of orders: 11 March 2016 Decision date: 11 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: See paragraph [7]. Catchwords: FAMILY PROVISION – two of three adult children of deceased seek orders for family provision – claimants are eligible persons - whether adequate provision made for plaintiffs in deceased's will – if so, what provision should be made for the plaintiffs. Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006, Chapter 3 Cases Cited: Chapple v Wilcox [2014] NSWCA 392 Drury v Smith [2012] NSWSC 1067 Evans v Levy [2011] NSWCA 125 Singer v Berghouse (No. 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff (in 2014/214338): Bradley Craig Sellak Plaintiff (in 2014/245521): Scott Sellak Defendant: Tracy Sellak Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff (in 2014/214338): D. Roberts Plaintiff (in 2014/245521): P. Bates Defendant: G. Foster
Solicitors: Plaintiff (in 2014/214338): George West, Solicitor & Attorney Plaintiff (in 2014/245521): Vrege Kolokossian, Gerard Malouf & Partners Defendant: Angelo Valenti, Valenti & Valenti File Number(s): 2014/214338; 2014/245521 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate