NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Proud v R [2016] NSWCCA 41 Hearing dates: 11 March 2016 Decision date: 11 March 2016 Before: Basten JA; Johnson J ; R A Hulme J Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to amend her grounds of appeal to raise a challenge to the directions with respect to the mental element of extended joint criminal enterprise.
(2) Refuse application to vacate the hearing date. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - criminal appeal – court bound by authority to dismiss ground of appeal – authority to be challenged in proceedings pending in High Court – special leave application referred to Full Court for hearing – application to amend grounds to raise issue – application to vacate hearing of appeal pending determination in High Court Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), Pt 7 Cases Cited: Aston v The Queen S157/1994 [1995] HCATrans 278 Cheatle v The Queen (1993) 177 CLR 541; [1993] HCA 44 Clayton v The Queen [2006] HCA 58; 81 ALJR 439 Gillard v The Queen (2003) 219 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 64 Grierson v The King (1938) 60 CLR 431 McAuliffe v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 108 R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 R v Presley (2015) 122 SASR 476; [2015] SASCFC 53 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Michelle Sharon Proud (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms C Loukas SC (Applicant) Ms M Cinque SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate