NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Optimisation Australia Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 2072 Hearing dates: 16 November 2015 Date of orders: 16 November 2015 Decision date: 16 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Leave to adduce expert evidence granted. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – expert evidence – application by defendants for leave to adduce expert evidence – where expert evidence to be adduced to challenge Court expert's report – Court should be relatively ready to grant such leave where some arguable basis for challenging Court expert's report shown – whether belatedness of application militates against grant of leave – whether grant of leave would subject plaintiff to financial hardship in funding independent expert – whether difficulty of plaintiff's lawyers in approaching Court expert to discuss issues militates against granting leave. Cases Cited: Tomko v Tomko [2007] NSWSC 1486 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Brian Kearney (plaintiff) Optimisation Australia Pty Limited (first defendant) Gary Williams (second defendant) Susan Williams (third defendant) Sharmark Pty Ltd (fourth defendant) Orchard Office Services Pty Ltd (fifth defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Fernon (plaintiff) M P Cleary (defendants)
Solicitors: Self-represented (plaintiff) Australian Business Lawyers & Advisors Pty Limited (defendants) File Number(s): 2013/153589
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate