NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sahade v Bischoff (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 45 Hearing dates: On the papers(Last submissions 11 February 2016) Decision date: 15 March 2016 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Gleeson JA at [2]; Beech-Jones J at [34]. Decision: (1) The appellants to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal. (2) The cross-applicants to pay the cross-respondents' costs of the cross-summons. (3) Each party to bear their own costs of this application for costs. Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs – joint offer of compromise – where offerees have separate causes of action – whether offer capable of acceptance by offerees separately Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3, 59, 60 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 52A r 22 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 9, 20, 42, 51 Cases Cited: Archer v Archer (No 2) [2000] NSWCA 315 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] All ER 333 Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 873; 87 IPR 593 Taheri v Vitek (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 343 Vieira v O'Shea (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 121 Category: Costs Parties: Anthony Sahade (First appellant / First cross-respondent)
Adam Paul Smith (Second appellant / Second cross-respondent) Eckart Bischoff (First respondent / First cross-applicant) Celia Bischoff (Second respondent / Second cross-applicant) Representation: Counsel: B Coles QC / M Sahade (Appellants / Cross-respondents) J Maconachie QC / J Sheller (Respondents / Cross-applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate