NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Crowe-Maxwell v Frost [2016] NSWCA 46 Hearing dates: 17 September 2015 Decision date: 16 March 2016 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [129]; Gleeson JA at [130] Decision: (1) Extend time for the filing and service of the appellants' notice of appeal to 20 November 2014;
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – relief under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 588FE and 588FF – unreasonable director-related transactions within s 588FDA – s 588FDA(1)(c) – whether it may be expected that a reasonable person in the company's circumstances would not have entered into the transaction
EVIDENCE – challenge to evidential basis of primary judge's reasoning – whether pleadings can constitute evidence
EVIDENCE – challenge to evidential basis of primary judge's reasoning – whether statements at bar table relied on as evidence – statements by way of explanation
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – appeals – notice of intention to appeal served out of time – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 1.12 – whether extension of time should be granted – no evidence respondents prejudiced by delay Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Apollo Shower Screens Pty Ltd & Anor v Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Corporation (1985) 1 NSWLR 561 Bhagat v Global Custodians Ltd [2002] FCA 223 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63; 98 ER 969 Brogden v Metropolitan Railways Co (1876-77) 2 App Cas 666 Campbell v Illawarra Golf Club Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 341 Fisher v Divine Homes Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 8; 85 ACSR 512 Gibbons v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2003] NSWSC 936 Hawksford v Hawksford [2005] NSWSC 463; 191 FLR 173 ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Young [2009] FCA 109 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR [97326] Jingalong Pty Ltd v Todd [2014] NSWCA 330 Laidlaw v Hillier Hewitt Elsley Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 44 Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2008] HCA 27; 232 CLR 635 McDonald v Hanselmann [1998] NSWSC 171; 144 FCR 470 Mulherin v Bank of Western Australia Ltd; McCann v Bank of Western Australia Ltd [2006] QCA 175 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul [1987] HCA 5; 162 CLR 221 Progressive Pod Properties Pty Ltd v A & M Green Investments Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 225 Randwick City Council v Fuller [1996] NSWCA 444; 90 LGERA 380 Re Lesvos Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1288 Smith (in his capacity as liquidator of Action Paintball Games Pty Ltd) v Starke (No 2) [2015] FCA 1119; 109 ACSR 145 Vasudevan v Becon Constructions (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] VSCA 14; 41 VR 445 Weaver v Harburn [2014] WASCA 227; 103 ACSR 416 Texts Cited: RP Austin and IM Murray, Ford Austin & Ramsay's Principles of Corporations Law, (LexisNexis Butterworths, as at December 2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Atle Crowe-Maxwell in his capacity as liquidator of I & K Frost Pty Ltd (in liq) (First Appellant) I & K Frost Pty Ltd (Second Appellant) Ian Frost (First Respondent) Kathrine Frost (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC; S Clemmett (Appellants) No appearance (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate