NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v Xiao [2016] NSWSC 240 Hearing dates: 14 December 2015 Date of orders: 11 March 2016 Decision date: 11 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hall J Decision: Sentence In respect of Charge 1, taking into account the additional matters on the Schedule pursuant to s 16A(2) of the Crimes Act, the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 6 years commencing 12 January 2014 and expiring on 11 January 2020 consisting of a non-parole period of 3 years 9 months expiring on 11 October 2017.
In respect of Charge 2, the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 7 years commencing on 12 April 2015 and expiring on 11 April 2022, consisting of a non-parole period of 4 years 3 months to commence on 12 April 2015 and to expire on 11 July 2019.
The effective overall sentence in respect of Charges 1 and 2 is a term of imprisonment of 8 years 3 months commencing on 12 January 2014 and expiring on 11 April 2022 with an effective overall non-parole period of 5 years 6 months. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – insider trader offences – sections 1043A(1)(d) and 1311(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – two rolled-up charges with a further rolled-up insider trading offence to be taken into account pursuant to s 16BA Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – offender a foreign national – managing director of Hanlong Mining Investments Pty Ltd (Hanlong Mining) – exploited inside information concerning two separate takeover targets of Hanlong Mining – breach of trust – quality of inside information was high – offender a true insider – share purchases and use of leveraged products (CFDs) using inside information – high level of premeditation and planning present and disguise of illegal transactions – amounts invested towards high end of the scale – Charge 2 offence involved a joint criminal enterprise – role of the offender – early guilty pleas – sentencing principles – parity issues – specific and general deterrence – principles – joint criminal enterprise Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1986 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1991 (No 1 of 2002) (2002) 137 A Crim R 180; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Barbaro v R; Zirilli v R [2014] HCA 2 Chayadi v The Crown (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Director of Public Prosecutions v O'Reilly [2010] VSC 138 The DPP v Fabriczy (2010) 30 VR 632 DPP (Cth) v Hill and Kamay [2015] VSC 86 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462 Hartman v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2011] NSWCCA 261 Hili v Jones (2010) 242 CLR 520 Joffe v R; Stromer v R (2012) 82 NSWLR 510; [2012] NSWCCA 277 Kamay v R [2015] VSCA 296 Khoo v R [2013] NSWCCA 323 Markarian v R [2005] 228 CLR 357 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v De Silva (2011) 84 ACSR 240; [2011] NSWSC 243 R v Glynatsis (2013) 230 A Crim R 99; [2013] NSWCCA 131 R v Glynatsis [2012] NSWSC 1551 R v Hill; R v Kamay [2015] VSC 86 R v Hinchcliffe [2013] NSWCCA 327 R v Joffe; R v Stromer (2015) 106 ACSR 255; [2015] NSWSC 741 R v Knight [2004] NSWCCA 145 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 R v Rivkin (2003) 198 ALR 400 R v Rivkin (2004) 59 NSWLR 284; [2004] NSWCCA 7 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Tylor (2007) 173 A Crim R 458; [2007] NSWCCA 247 R v Zhu (2013) NSWSC 127 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Hui Xiao (Offender) Representation: Counsel: RJ Bromwich SC (Crown) M Ramage QC (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate