NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application of Dragan Cvetkovic pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2016] NSWSC 260 Hearing dates: On written submissions Decision date: 17 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) The application of Dragan Cvetkovic of 25 June 2015 pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) is refused, except in accordance with order 2. (2) Pursuant to s 79(3A)(c) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), the application is deferred for further consideration by me, but only with regard to the issue of whether a "Muldrock error" affected the sentence at first instance. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for inquiry into conviction and sentence following conviction - Pt 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 – whether Muldrock error at first instance – application with regard to sentence deferred with regard to a specific aspect Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 78(1), 79(3)(a)(i), 79(3A)(c) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 23C(c) Cases Cited: Aldous v R [2012] NSWCCA 153 Application by Frank Sinkovich pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2013] NSWSC 1342 Application of Ivan Robert Marko Milat under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2015] NSWSC 209 Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Cvetkovic v R [2010] NSWCCA 329 Cvetkovic v R [2013] NSWCCA 66 Cvetkovic v The Queen [2011] HCASL 133 Cvetkovic v The Queen [2013] HCASL 131 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) [2003] HCA 28; (2003) 214 CLR 318 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 M'Naghten's Case [1843] 8 ER 718 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39 Pfitzner v R [2010] NSWCCA 314 R v Porter (1933) 55 CLR182 R v Youssef (1990) 50 A Crim R 1 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Ryan v R [1967] HCA 2; (1967) 121 CLR 205 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dragan Cvetkovic (Applicant) Attorney-General of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Hammond (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate