NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 14) (Judge alone application) [2016] NSWSC 274 Hearing dates: 14 March 2016 Date of orders: 24 March 2016 Decision date: 24 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: The application by each of the accused for a trial by judge order under s 132 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for trial by judge alone – lonely judge sitting in chambers – interests of justice – relevant considerations – pre-trial publicity – sensational and tendentious reporting – the Googling juror – whether safeguards available to ensure fair trial – whether jury direction capable of curing prejudice – academic studies – judicial wishful thinking – where self-defence likely to be raised – reasonableness – issue requiring application of objective community standards – whether duress gives rise to questions of community standards – where five accused seek judge alone trial – significant matter to be taken into account – conflict in authorities – whether intention involves application of objective community standards – whether jury better placed to assess questions of credibility – whether where we are and what we're doing may all be an illusion Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Jury Act 1977 (NSW) Cases Cited: Arthurs v Western Australia [2007] WASC 182 BC v R [2015] NSWCCA 327 Coates v Western Australia [2009] WASCA 142 Darwiche v R; El-Zeyat v R; Aouad v R; Osman v R [2011] NSWCCA 62 Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim [2012] NSWCCA 125; 293 ALR 384 Fairfax Publications v The District Court of NSW [2004] NSWCA 324; 61 NSWLR 344 Folbigg v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 371 Gilbert v The Queen [2000] HCA 15; 201 CLR 414 Kingswell v R [1985] HCA 72; 159 CLR 264 Murphy v The Queen [1989] HCA 28; 167 CLR 94 Redman v R [2015] NSWCCA 110 Reeves v R; R v Reeves [2013] NSWCCA 34 R v Abrahams [2013] NSWSC 729 R v Abusafiah (1991) 24 NSWLR 531 R v Belghar [2012] NSWCCA 86; 217 A Crim R 1 R v Benbrika [2009] VSC 142 R v Dean [2013] NSWSC 661 R v Debs [2011] NSWSC 1248 R v Fardon [2010] QCA 317 R v Farrow [2014] NSWSC 1781 R v FH [2012] NSWDC 283 R v Gittany [2013] NSWSC 1503 R v Glennon [1992] HCA 16; 173 CLR 592 R v GSR (No 3) [2011] NSWDC 17 R v Hawi [2014] NSWSC 837 R v Jamal [2008] NSWCCA 177; 72 NSWLR 258 R v K [2003] NSWCCA 406; 59 NSWLR 431 R v King [2013] NSWSC 448 R v Markou [2011] NSWDC 25 R v McKnight [2014] NSWSC 398 R v McNeil [2015] NSWSC 357 R v McNeil (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 757 See R v McNeil (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1198 R v Pimentel [1999] NSWCCA 401; 110 A Crim R 30 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 15 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 4) [2016] NSWSC 114 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 113 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 115 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 15) [2016] NSWSC 318 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 16) [2016] NSWSC 319 R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 259 R v Simmons (No 7) [2015] NSWSC 574 R v Skaf [2004] NSWCCA 37; 60 NSWLR 86 R v Stanley [2013] NSWCCA 124 R v Tasich [2012] NSWDC 261 R v Trawin-Hadfield [2014] NSWSC 591 R v Villalon [2013] NSWSC 1516 R v Wood [2008] NSWSC 817; 186 A Crim R 454 Texts Cited: Bagaric, Mirko, "The community interest in bringing suspects to trial trumps the right to an impartial decision maker – at least in Victoria" (2010) 34(1) Criminal Law Journal 5 Burd, Roxanne & Horan, Jacqueline "Protecting the Right to a Fair Trial in the 21st Century – has a trial by jury being caught in the world wide web?" (2012) 36 Criminal Law Journal 103 Hunter, Jill, "Jurors' Notions of Justice; An Empirical Study of Motivations to Investigate and Obedience to Judicial Directions" (2014) Faculty of Law of the New South Wales University Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Farhad Qaumi Mumtaz Qaumi Jamil Qaumi Mohammed Zarshoy Mohammed Kalal Representation: Counsel: K McKay & P Hogan (Crown) J Stratton SC & M Curry (F Qaumi) P Young SC (M Quami) N Carroll(J Quami) R Driels (Zarshoy) L McSpedden (Kalal)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate