NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Johnston v Johnston [2016] NSWCA 52 Hearing dates: 11 March 2016 Date of orders: 21 March 2016 Decision date: 21 March 2016 Before: Ward JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [55]; Simpson JA at [56] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal with costs. Catchwords: COSTS – costs following settlement of contested probate proceedings – where offer of compromise accepted by respondents (defendants at first instance) – application of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 42.13A where offer proposed both consent to grant of probate in solemn form and payment of monetary sum to respondents – characterisation of offer of compromise as "mixed offer" proposing judgment both in favour of plaintiffs and defendants – r 42.13A inapplicable – where general costs discretion under s 98 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) not exercised – whether matter should be remitted Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 98 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(c) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 20.26, 20.27, 42.13A, 51.53 Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 WLR 586 Estate of Moyle: Moyle v Moyle (Supreme Court (NSW), Santow J, 18 June 1998, unreported) Maitland Hospital v Fisher (No 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 721 Middlebrook v Middlebrook (1962) 36 ALJR 216 Orton v Smith (1873) LR 3 P & D 23 Owners Corporation SP 74667; 74670 and 74662 v Auburn City Council [2015] NSWSC 86 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Baker [1999] NSWCA 244 Prosperity Advisers Pty Ltd v Secure Enterprises Pty Ltd t/as Strathearn Insurance Brokers [2012] NSWCA 192 Re Estate late Hazel Ruby Grounds; Page v Sedawie [2005] NSWSC 1311 Re Estate of Hodges (deceased); Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; (1997) 186 CLR 622 Redroff v Miegoch (Supreme Court (NSW), Santow J, 22 April 1996, unreported) Shorten v Shorten [2001] NSWSC 363 Shorten v Shorten [2002] NSWCA 73 Shorten v Shorten [2003] NSWCA 60 The Estate of Edward Richard Johnston [2015] NSWSC 1559 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Kaye Johnston (First Applicant) Zenith Patricia Grant (Second Applicant) James Edward Breck Johnston (Third Applicant) David Alan Johnston (First Respondent) Fay Hogan (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Alexis SC with P Afshar (Applicants) MR Tyson (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate