NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Grills v R [2016] NSWCCA 46 Hearing dates: 9 November 2015 Decision date: 01 April 2016 Before: Beazley P at [1] Davies J at [2] R S Hulme AJ at [47] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted (2) Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – supply prohibited drug – possess prohibited firearm – totality principle – whether the sentence for one offence can comprehend the criminality of the other - relationship of firearms to drug supply business – whether extent of accumulation produced a manifestly excessive overall sentence – no challenge to individual sentences Legislation Cited: Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ayshow v R [2011] NSWCCA 240 JT v R [2012] NSWCCA 133 R v AZ [2011] NSWCCA 43 R v Holder and Johnston [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Najem [2008] NSWCCA 32 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; (2009) 195 A Crim R 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rodney Craig Grills (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Webb (Applicant) M Cinque SC (Crown)
Solicitors: S E O'Connor (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2013/334205 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 19 December 2014 Before: McLoughlin DCJ File Number(s): 2013/334205
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate