NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hornsby Shire Council v Trives (No 4) [2016] NSWLEC 28 Hearing dates: 24 March 2016 Date of orders: 24 March 2016 Decision date: 24 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Craig J Decision: Refer to [24] Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - whether complying development certificates issued by accredited certifier for erection of "detached studios" are valid – certificates granted in breach of the Act – declaratory order made - mandatory orders sought for the demolition of works constructed pursuant to the complying development certificates - not opposed by respondent – prohibited development - order for demolition made – extended time for compliance to afford reasonable opportunity for respondents to seek consent from the Council to retain some part of the structure for a lawful purpose
COSTS - costs attributable to the determination of a separate question - costs attributable to the proceedings generally - r 42.1 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 - practice of awarding costs in proceedings with multiple respondents - whether a party should be entitled to costs where party filed a submitting appearance save as to costs - first respondent to pay costs of applicant in all three proceedings and those of the second and third respondents in two of the proceedings Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Cutcliffe v Lithgow City Council [2006] NSWLEC 463; 147 LGERA 330 Hornsby Shire Council v Trives [2014] NSWLEC 171 Hornsby Shire Council v Trives (No 3) [2015] NSWLEC 190 Hurstville City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 196 Manns v Attorney General of NSW (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 325 Trives v Hornsby Shire Council [2015] NSWCA 158; 89 NSWLR 268 Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1987) 10 NSWLR 335 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Proceedings 14/40215 Hornsby Shire Council (Applicant) Simon Trives (First Respondent) Lachlan Bardo (Second Respondent) Jing Yan (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate