NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stankovic v State of NSW (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 335 Hearing dates: 17 March 2016 Date of orders: 07 April 2016 Decision date: 07 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Vary order 3 made by me on 8 February 2016 to provide:
The Plaintiff should pay the Defendants' costs in the sum of $18,122. Catchwords: COSTS – lump sum costs orders - plaintiff's proceedings summarily dismissed - circumstances where appropriate to make lump sum costs order - plaintiff asserts that he is impecunious – discount to be applied – lump sum cost order made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General in and for the State of NSW v Bar-Mordecai [2013] NSWSC 1307 Australasian Performing Rights Association Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119; 135 ALR 160 Bobb v Wombat Securities Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 863 Coshott v Parker (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1195 Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 13) [2009] NSWSC 756 Hamod v State of New South Wales and Anor [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison & Anor v Schipp [2002] NSWCA 213; (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No. 4) [2013] NSWSC 811 Stankovic v State of NSW [2016] NSWSC 18 Young v Hones (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 499 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 99 Category: Costs Parties: Milovan Stankovic (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (First Defendant) Land and Environment Court of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiff) G Sarginson (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate