NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Capogreco v Rogerson [2016] NSWCA 61 Hearing dates: 23 March 2016 Decision date: 23 March 2016 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Simpson JA at [18] Decision: (1) Dismiss the application for leave to appeal.
(2) The applicants to pay the first respondent's costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – costs – challenge to apportionment of costs – partial success at trial – whether costs should be apportioned as to causes of action where issues intertwined – whether apportionment to be based on pre-trial costs of preparation of evidence – whether costs assessor could allocate costs after the event
COSTS – Calderbank letter – whether offer of fixed costs a genuine offer of compromise Category: Principal judgment Parties: Antonio Capogreco (First Applicant) Rosa Capogreco (Second Applicant) Anna Pirrello (Third Applicant) Joseph Mark Pirrello (Fourth Applicant) Graeme Rogerson (First Respondent) Bruce McHugh (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr MR Pesman SC/Mr A Di Francesco (Applicants) Mr RS Angyal SC (First Respondent)
Solicitors: Wood Marshall Williams Pty Ltd (Applicants) Macquarie Legal Practice (First Respondent) Equilaw Solicitors (Second Respondent) File Number(s): CA 2015/341848 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Equity Division Date of Decision: 23 October 2015 Before: Bergin CJ in Eq File Number(s): 2013/369921
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate