NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zey v Bunnings Group Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 72 Hearing dates: 11 February 2016 Date of orders: 31 March 2016 Decision date: 31 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Dicker SC, Senior Member K Rosser, Senior Member Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: APPEAL – Consumer Claim – Australian Consumer Law – Fit for disclosed purpose – Weight of evidence - Whether question of law established – leave to appeal Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Act 2013 Consumer Claims Act 1998 Fair Trading Act 1999 Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: Herbert v American Express Australia Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 47 Jenkinson v Chaw [2015] NSWCATAP 127 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eedra Zey – Appellant Bunnings Group Ltd t/as Bunnings Warehouse Representation: Appellant - self- represented Respondent – Mr Martindale File Number(s): AP 15/50747 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 5 August 2015 Before: M Gilson, General Member File Number(s): GEN15/05133
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate