NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Adam Geoffrey Hansell v R [2016] NSWDC 35 Hearing dates: 15 March 2016 Date of orders: 01 April 2016 Decision date: 01 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge AC Scotting Decision: The appeal against conviction is dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – finding of guilt – conviction – film person in private act without consent – aggravated film person in private act without consent – inference EVIDENCE – circumstantial evidence OFFENCE – elements of offence established – conceded elements - element in dispute - purpose of gratification or sexual arousal OTHER – USB camera – filming – other purposes for filming Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 ss 91K(1), 91K(3) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 s.18(1) Cases Cited: R v Hodge (1838) 2 Lewin 227 at 228, Howie v Budd [2003] TASSC 49 at [9] and Edwards v R (1993) 178 CLR 193 and Shepherd v R (1990) 170 CLR 573 Gianoutsas v Glykis [2006] NSWCCA 137 Charara v R [2006] NSWCCA 244 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam Geoffrey Hansell (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Boland (Appellant)
Solicitors: Blair Criminal Lawyers (Appellant) C Hyland, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Repsondent) File Number(s): 2014/00121157
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate