NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Arfaras v Vosnakis [2016] NSWCA 65 Hearing dates: 23 February 2016 Date of orders: 07 April 2016 Decision date: 07 April 2016 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Ward JA at [2]; Simpson JA at [121] Decision: (1) Leave be granted to appeal/cross-appeal. (2) Appeal be dismissed. (3) Cross-appeal be dismissed. (4) Applicant to pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings in this Court of both the appeal and the cross-appeal. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – whether promise to transfer burial licence gave rise to binding contract – whether mutual promises offered in consideration of one another – whether objective intention to create legally binding relations
ESTOPPEL – by conduct – proprietary estoppel by encouragement – promise by applicant to transfer burial plot to respondent to enable him to be buried next to his late wife in due course – whether loss of ability to be buried next to wife as a result of applicant's failure to honour promise sufficient detrimental reliance for purposes of equitable estoppel Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(r) Cases Cited: Ashton v Pratt [2015] NSWCA 12; (2015) 88 NSWLR 281 Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [1954] HCA 20; (1954) 92 CLR 424 Barns v Barns [2003] HCA 9; (2003) 214 CLR 169 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Commonwealth v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39; (1990) 170 CLR 394 Delaforce v Simpson-Cook [2010] NSWCA 84; (2010) 78 NSWLR 483 DHJPM Pty Ltd v Blackthorn Resources Ltd [2011] NSWCA 348; (2011) 83 NSWLR 728 Dillwyn v Llewelyn (1862) 4 De GF & J 517; 45 ER 1285 Donis v Donis [2007] VSCA 89; (2007) 19 VR 577 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 8; (2002) 209 CLR 95 Fifteenth Eestin Nominees Pty Ltd v Rosenberg (No 2) [2009] VSCA 178; (2009) 24 VR 155 Giumelli v Giumelli [1999] HCA 10; (1999) 196 CLR 101 Grundt v Great Boulder Proprietary Gold Mines Ltd [1937] HCA 58; (1937) 59 CLR 641 Jennings v Rice [2003] 1 P & CR 100; [2002] EWCA Civ 159 Legione v Hateley [1983] HCA 11; (1983) 152 CLR 406 Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129 Saleh v Romanous [2010] NSWCA 274; (2010) 79 NSWLR 453 Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19; (2014) 251 CLR 505 Silovi Pty Ltd v Barbaro (1988) 13 NSWLR 466 Svenson v Payne [1945] HCA 43; (1945) 71 CLR 531 Vukic v Grbin [2006] NSWSC 41 Walsh v Walsh [2012] NSWCA 57 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher [1988] HCA 7; (1988) 164 CLR 387 Wells v Matthews [1914] HCA 50; (1914) 18 CLR 440 Texts Cited: JD Heydon, MJ Leeming and PG Turner, Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (5th ed, 2014, LexisNexis) PS Atiyah and SA Smith, Introduction to the Law of Contract (6th ed, 2005, Clarendon Press) PW Young, C Croft and ML Smith, On Equity (2009, Lawbook Co) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aristea Arfaras (Applicant/Cross-respondent) Joseph Vosnakis (Respondent/Cross-applicant) Representation: Counsel: B Coles QC with M Holmes (Applicant/Cross-respondent) GM McGrath with L Teoh (Respondent/Cross-applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate