NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barrie Toepfer Earthmoving and Land Management Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd [2016] NSWCA 67 Hearing dates: 25 September 2015 Decision date: 07 April 2016 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Ward JA at [100]; Sackville AJA at [101] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Set aside order 2 made on 28 August 2014. 3. Judgment for the cross-claimant/appellant (Barrie Toepfer Earthmoving and Land Management Pty Ltd) against the cross-defendants/respondents (CGU Insurance Limited, Vero Insurance Limited and NTI Limited) on the amended cross-claim. 4. The respondents pay the appellant's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: INSURANCE – commercial motor vehicle policy – height of excavator carried on vehicle exceeded low clearance height and struck spans of Hexham Bridge – whether insurers entitled to rely upon exclusion in respect of damage caused by recklessness and breach of condition as to taking of reasonable care – onus of proof in relation to compliance with condition – whether employee's conduct in driving onto or over bridge involved failure to take such precautions as he considered reasonable having regard to risk recognised – whether primary judge erred in finding insurer entitled to refuse indemnity by reason of employee's recklessness – whether obligation imposed by condition to comply with statutory obligations absolute Legislation Cited: Australian Road Rules, r 102 Roads Act 1993 (NSW), s 102(2) Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) (Road Rules) Regulation 1999 (NSW), reg 6 Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Regulation 1998 (NSW), reg 57(1); Sch 4, cl 76 Cases Cited: Albion Insurance Company Ltd v Body Corporate Strata Plan No 4303 [1983] 2 VR 339 Australian Casualty Co Ltd v Federico [1986] HCA 32; 160 CLR 513 CGU Insurance Ltd v Lawless [2008] VSCA 38; 15 ANZ Ins Cas 61-755 Digby v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation Ltd [1943] AC 121 Fraser v B N Furman (Productions) Ltd [1967] 1 WLR 898 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298 Kodak (Australasia) Pty Ltd v Retail Traders Mutual Indemnity Insurance Association (1942) 42 SR (NSW) 231 Legal and General Insurance Australia Ltd v Eather (1986) 6 NSWLR 390 McLennan v Insurance Australia Ltd [2014] NSWCA 300; 313 ALR 173 Tesco Supermarkets Limited v Nattrass [1972] AC 153 The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co Ltd v Costain Australia Ltd [1988] NSWCA 157; (1989) 5 ANZ Ins Cas 60-891 Vero Insurance Ltd v Power Technologies Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 226; 14 ANZ Ins Cas 61-745 Wallaby Grip Limited v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2010] HCA 9; 240 CLR 444 Wilkie v Gordian Runoff Limited [2005] HCA 17; 221 CLR 522 Woolfall & Rimmer Ltd v Moyle [1942] 1 KB 66 Texts Cited: Prof M Clarke, The Law of Insurance Contracts (6th ed, 2009, Informa) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Barrie Toepfer Earthmoving and Land Management Pty Ltd (Appellant) CGU Insurance Limited (First Respondent) Vero Insurance Limited (Second Respondent) NTI Limited (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Cavanagh SC with P Gow (Appellant) P Deakin QC with P Stockley (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate