NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Parkinson v R [2016] NSWCCA 49 Hearing dates: 22 September 2015 Decision date: 08 April 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Price J at [2] Button J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal with regard to ground two refused. (2) Leave to appeal with regard to ground one granted. (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – whether the trial judge misdirected the jury with regard to evidence of complaint – whether verdicts of guilty rationally consistent with verdicts of acquittal – whether verdicts of guilty unreasonable or unable to be supported Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(2), 61N(1), 61N(2), 66C(1), 66C(3), 66EB(3) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Cases Cited: Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCA 29 Glover v R; Stuart v R [2015] NSWCCA 285 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MacKenzie v the Queen [1996] HCA 35; (1996) 190 CLR 348 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Darren James Parkinson Regina Representation: Counsel: P Rosser QC (Applicant) L McLaughlin (Applicant) N Noman SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: C Peters (Applicant) C Hyland – Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/384642 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 13 February 2015 Before: Syme DCJ File Number(s): 2013/384642
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate