NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: L J Carroll v L T Carroll [2016] NSWSC 390 Hearing dates: 23 March 2016 Decision date: 24 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Black J Decision: Order that proceedings be stood over and caveat be extended to that date. Catchwords: Torrens title — Caveats — Application under s 74K of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) for extension of caveat until further court order – where Plaintiff submits various grounds for an interest in the property the subject of caveat – whether caveator's claim to an interest in property raises a seriously arguable case for final relief – whether balance of convenience favours extension of caveat. Legislation Cited: - Real Property Act 1925 (NSW), ss 74K, 74L Cases Cited: - Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137; [1987] HCA 59 - Break Fast Investments Pty Ltd v C & O Voukidis Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 871 - Choi v Kim [2013] NSWSC 1774 - Cradock v Scottish Provident Institution (1893) 69 LT 380 - Cradock v Scottish Provident Institution (1893) 70 LT 718 - Gerard v Jacquin [2011] NSWSC 913 - Jones v Baker [2002] NSWSC 89; (2002) 10 BPR 19,115 - Kerabee Park Pty Ltd v Daley [1978] 2 NSWLR 222 - Milling v Hardie [2014] NSWCA 163 - Milstern Retirement Services Pty Ltd v The Owners Strata Plan No 22521 [2006] NSWSC 301; (2006) NSWConvR 56-151 at [19] - Peters v Lithgow Forge Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 283 - Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129 - Ruxan Pty Ltd v Peachme Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 1221 - Sidhu v Van Dyke (2014) 251 CLR 505 - Swiss Bank Corporation v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1982] 2 AC 584 - Syndication Capital Group Pty Ltd v MDR Cornish Investments Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1289 - Tadrous v Tadrous [2012] NSWCA 16 Texts Cited: - Heydon et al, Meagher Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, (5th ed 2015, LexisNexis Butterworths) - P W Young et al, On Equity, (2009, Lawbook Co) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Louise Janet Carroll (Plaintiff) Louis Thomas Carroll (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R E Dubler (Plaintiff) L T Livingston (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate