NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Steiner v Strang (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 394 Hearing dates: 6 April 2016 Date of orders: 19 April 2016 Decision date: 19 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Lindsay J Decision: Order for dismissal of a motion (under UCPR rule 14.28) that an amended statement of cross claim be struck out Catchwords: PRACTICE – Application for summary relief – Pleading alleged to be defective – Strike out application dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 NSW Limitations Act 1969 NSW. Probate and Administration Act 1898 NSW Succession Act 2006 NSW Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW Cases Cited: Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 at 664 Kuligowski v Metrobus (2004) 220 CLR 363 at 373 [21] and 375 [25] Steiner v Strang [2016] NSWSC 395 Steiner v Strang [2016] NSWSC 9 Steiner v Strang [2015] NSWCA 203 Steiner v Kenneth Ross Strang and Jason Tang [2014] NSWSC 1250 Texts Cited: - Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff (Cross Defendant): J Steiner First Defendant (First Cross Claimant): KR Strang Second Defendant (Second Cross Claimant): J Tang Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff/Cross Defendant: DKL Raphael Defendants/Cross Claimants: L Ellison SC
Solicitors: Plaintiff/Cross Defendant: Gells Solicitors Defendants/Cross Claimants: Glass Goodwin Solicitors File Number(s): 2012/0185566
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate