NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lazarus v R [2016] NSWCCA 52 Hearing dates: 19 February 2016 Decision date: 12 April 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [5] Fullerton J at [18] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. Conviction quashed. 4. Order a new trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – sexual intercourse without consent – whether verdict of the jury was unreasonable – adequacy of trial judge's directions as to the legal test in s 61HA(3)(c) of the Crimes Act Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61HA(3), 61I Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Cases Cited: Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131; 224 A Crim R 22 Kurdi v R [2011] NSWCCA 179 M v R [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 O'Sullivan v R; Flanders v R; Tohu v R & NRH v R [2012] NSWCCA 45 SKA v R [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Viro v R [1978] HCA 9; 141 CLR 88 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Luke Andrew Lazarus (Appellant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC / D Barrow (Appellant) N Adams (Crown)
Solicitors: Back Schwartz Vaughan Lawyers (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2013/242040 Publication restriction: Statutory non-publication order re identity of complainant Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 9 February 2015 Before: Huggett DCJ File Number(s): 2013/242040
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate