NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Barrett (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 86 Hearing dates: 4 August 2015, 26 October 2015 Date of orders: 13 April 2016 Decision date: 13 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: O'Connor ADCJ, Deputy President, Appeals P Molony, Senior Member Decision: Decision following Rehearing: The following are the final orders of the Tribunal in this matter. (1) Affirm agency's determination in relation to items 1 to 5, and item 7 of the review applicants' access applications. (2) Affirm agency's determination in relation to item 6 of the first review applicant's access application (John). (3) Set aside agency's determination in relation to item 6 of the second review applicant's access application (Lara). This matter is remitted, pursuant to s 63(3)(d) of the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 to the Commissioner for reconsideration and redetermination within 42 days of the date of this decision. Catchwords: GOVERNMENT INFORMATION (PUBLIC ACCESS) – Rehearing – Review of agency determinations refusing information – Whether effect on audit functions of agency gave rise to an overriding public interest consideration against disclosure of certain information requested – Whether decision justified that certain information requested was not held – Whether decision justified to refuse to confirm or deny that certain information requested is held by the agency because of an overriding public interest against confirming or denying that fact – Agency decision as to the set aside, and review application remitted for reconsideration in that regard. Government Information (Public Access) Act 2013, ss 12-15; s 58(1)(b), s 58(1)(d), s 58(1)(f). Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2013 Cases Cited: Flack v Commissioner of Police [2011] NSWADT 286 Neary v State Rail Authority [1999] NSWADT 107, Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Camilleri [2012] NSWADTAP 19 Searle Australia Pty Ltd v Pubic Interest Advocacy Centre (1992) 108 ALR 163. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Appellant) John Barrett (First Respondent) Lisa Hogan (Second Respondent) Representation: Solicitor: K Mattes (Appellant) No appearance (First Respondent) In person (Second Respondent) File Number(s): AP 14/46349 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Citation: Barrett v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 31; Barrett v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 32 Date of Decision: 24 March 2014 Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member File Number(s): 123193; 123194
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate