NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: A J Bush & Sons (Manufactures) Pty Ltd v Bhanotar [2016] NSWSC 422 Hearing dates: 8 April 2016 Date of orders: 20 April 2016 Decision date: 20 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pembroke J Decision: Stay granted Catchwords: PROCEDURE – whether a stay should be granted until the conclusion of related criminal proceedings –need for prejudice which must be apparent and not merely fanciful – criteria for grant of stay Legislation Cited: Crimes Act, 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Zhao [2015] HCA 5 Director of Public Prosecutions v Jo [2007] QCA 251 Fotis v Favret, Supreme Court of New South Wales, unreported, 8 May 1996 Jefferson Ltd v Bhetcha [1979] 2 All ER 1108 Category: Principal judgment Parties: A J Bush and Sons (Manufactures) Pty Ltd – plaintiff Bharatkumar Amrutlal Bhanotar – first defendant Hinaben Bharatkumar Bhanotar – second defendant Mahendrakumar Jivrambhai Patel – third defendant Sonalben Mahendrakumar Patel – fourth defendant Nareshkumar Govinda – fifth defendant Maheshbhai Kugashiya – sixth defendant Dipakkumar Govinda – seventh defendant Prakashkumar Karnavat – eighth defendant Saket Hareshbhai Kanani – ninth defendant Representation: Counsel: B Ilkovski – for the plaintiff No appearance - for the first and second defendants J Tyrell – for the third and fourth defendants J Mack – for the fifth defendant No appearance for the sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate